الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Summary Orthodontic treatment is most effective when the facial and cephalometric distinctiveness of the particular patient’s ethnic background are taken into consideration. An ever-increasing number of individuals are seeking orthodontic treatment, mostly to enhance facial aesthetics for attractive facial and smile features. Achieving a suitable and functional occlusion combined with an esthetically pleasing facial appearance which is more challenging to the orthodontist and desires of patients’ esthetic self-perception. This study aimed to assess and determine the sagittal lip positions of the normal faces in a Bahraini sub population from various unidentified lateral cephalograms. One hundred and seven unidentified lateral cephalographs of good quality selected from the archive of medical centers, Kingdom of Bahrain, with the teeth in occlusion and lips in a relaxed position. Eight measurements; four angular, three linear, and one ratio-related; were made on each cephalometric image. The landmarks were located according to the definitions of Legan–Burstone. • Angles for evaluation of the subject`s skeletal type: - SNA - SNB - ANB • Measurements for evaluation of the subject`s lip position and form: - Nasolabial angle (Cm-Sn-Ls). - Upper lip protrusion (Ls to Sn-Pog’). - Lower-lip protrusion (Li to Sn-Pog’). - Mentolabial sulcus depth (Si to Li-Pog’). - Vertical lip–chin ratio (Sn-Stms/Stmi-Me’) 54 Summary In Bahraini population, the results show significant protrusive in the upper and lower lips (males and females) according to Burstone’s B line. • Comparison of lip position between Bahraini adults and Saudi population norms: A little increase in the Nasolabial angle in Bahraini population, while the upper and lower lip protrusions and mentolabial sulcus depth are higher in Saudi than Bahraini. The vertical lip-chin relation is almost the same for both populations. • Comparison of lip position between Bahraini adults and Egyptian population norms: There is increase in the Nasolabial angle in Bahraini than Egyptian, while the upper and lower lip protrusion, mentolabial sulcus depth are increased more in Egyptian than Bahraini. The vertical lip-chin relation is almost the same for both populations. |